Vol. 19 No. 1 (2020)
Original Articles

Musculoskeletal and cognitive effects of stochastic resonance whole body vibration: A randomized controlled trial

Yannik Faes
Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.
Cornelia Rolli Salathé
Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.
Céline Cébe
Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland
Andreas Szukics
Department of Work and Organizatonal Psychology, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.
Achim Elfering
Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.

Published 2020-07-03

Keywords

  • Stochastic resonance whole body vibration (SRWBV),
  • Musculoskeletal effects,
  • Cognitive effects,
  • Inhibitory control,
  • Randomized controlled trial

How to Cite

1.
Yannik Faes, Cornelia Rolli Salathé, Céline Cébe, Andreas Szukics, Achim Elfering. Musculoskeletal and cognitive effects of stochastic resonance whole body vibration: A randomized controlled trial. BJHBS [Internet]. 2020 Jul. 3 [cited 2024 Oct. 11];19(1):20-3. Available from: https://bjhbs.hupe.uerj.br/bjhbs/article/view/103

Abstract

Introduction: We investigated the acute musculoskeletal and cognitive effects of stochastic resonance whole-body vibration (SR-WBV). To our knowledge, no study looked at the effects of SR-WBV on inhibitory control so far. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, participants were randomly allocated into a verum (6 Hz, SR-WBV) or sham (2 Hz, SR-WBV) condition. Inhibitory control was measured with the Stroop Test before and after the exercise. Also, muscle stiffness, muscle relaxation, sense of balance and surefootedness were assessed in a questionnaire before and after the exercise. Results: Inhibitory control increased significantly after verum SR-WBV (t = 2.949, P = 0.018), but not after sham SR-WBV (t = 1.165, P = 0.252). Muscle stiffness decreased significantly after verum (t = 5.273, P < 0.000), but not after sham SR-WBV (t = 1.533, P = 0.135). Also, muscle relaxation increased significantly after verum (t = -2.879, P = 0.007), but not after sham SR-WBV (t = -1.650, P = 0.108). Sense of balance increased significantly after verum (t = -2.061, P = 0.047), but not after sham SR-WBV (t = 0.347, P = 0.730). No significant effect was found in surefootedness, whether after verum (t = -0.966, P = 0.341) nor after sham SR-WBV (t = 0.849, P = 0.402). Conclusions: SR-WBV seems to be an appropriate method to improve not only physiological measurements but newly also cognition, i.e. inhibitory control. In this study we could show that SR-WBV exercise reduces interference and increases inhibitory control in a young and healthy sample.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Burger C, Schade V, Lindner C, et al. Stochastic resonance training reduces musculoskeletal symptoms in metal manufacturing workers: A controlled preventive intervention study. Work. 2012;42(2):269-78.
  2. Elfering A, Arnold S, Schade V, et al. Stochastic resonance whole-body vibration, musculoskeletal symptoms, and body balance: a worksite training study. Saf Health Work. 2013;4(3):149-55.
  3. Pang MY. Whole body vibration therapy in fracture prevention among adults with chronic disease. World J Orthop. 2010;1(1):20.
  4. Elfering A, Zahno J, Taeymans J, et al. Acute efects of stochastic resonance whole body vibration. World J Orthop. 2013;4(4):291.
  5. Faes Y, Maguire C, Notari M, et al. Stochastic Resonance Training Improves Balance and Musculoskeletal Well-Being in Ofce Workers: A Controlled Preventive Intervention Study. Rehabil Res Pract. 2018;2018.
  6. Elfering A, Schade V, Burger C, et al. Stochastic resonance training at work reduces musculoskeletal pain in nurses. Dufy V, Lightner N Advances in Human Aspects of Healthcare USA: AHFE Conference; 2014.
  7. Elfering A, Schade V, Stoecklin L, et al. Stochastic resonance whole-body vibration improves postural control in health care professionals: a worksite randomized controlled trial. Workplace Health Saf. 2014;62(5):187-96.
  8. Awan, R. I., Khan, N., & Perveen, S. (2017). The Efect of WBV on Balance, Mobility and Strength in Aging Adults: A Systematic Review. Biological Systems: Open Access, 6(1), 179-185. doi: 10.4172/2329-6577.1000179
  9. Rogan S, Hilfker R, Schenk A, et al. Efects of whole-body vibration with stochastic resonance on balance in persons with balance disability and falls history–a systematic review. Res Sports Med. 2014;22(3):294-313.
  10. Rogan S, de Bruin ED, Radlinger L, et al. Efects of whole-body vibration on proxies of muscle strength in old adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of physical capacity level. Eur Rev Aging Phys A. 2015;12(1):12.
  11. Kessler J, Radlinger L, Baur H, et al. Efect of stochastic resonance whole body vibration on functional performance in the frail elderly: A pilot study. Arch Gerontol Geriat. 2014;59(2):305-11.
  12. Rogan S, Hilfker R, Schmid S, et al. Stochastic resonance whole-body vibration training for chair rising performance on untrained elderly: A pilot study. Arch Gerontol Geriat. 2012;55(2):468-73.
  13. Fuermaier AB, Tucha L, Koerts J, et al. Good vibrations–efects of whole body vibration on attention in healthy individuals and individuals with ADHD. PloS One. 2014;9(2):e90747.
  14. Regterschot GRH, Van Heuvelen MJ, Zeinstra EB, et al. Whole body vibration improves cognition in healthy young adults. PloS One. 2014;9(6):e100506.
  15. den Heijer AE, Groen Y, Fuermaier AB, et al. Acute efects of Whole Body Vibration on inhibition in healthy children. PloS One. 2015;10(11):e0140665.
  16. Martin J. Neuroanatomy: text and atlas Mcgraw-Hill. New York. 2003.
  17. Braak H, Braak E, Yilmazer D, et al. Topical review: functional anatomy of human hippocampal formation and related structures. J Child Neurol. 1996;11(4):265-75.
  18. Van der Zee E, Riedel G, Rutgers E, et al. Enhanced neuronal activity in selective brain regions of mice induced by whole body stimulation. Federat Europ Neurosci Soc Abs. 2010;5(024.49):R2.
  19. Boerema AS, Heesterbeek M, Boersma SA, et al. Benefcial efects of whole body vibration on brain functions in mice and humans. Dose-Response. 2018;16(4):1-10.
  20. Robbins TW. Dissociating executive functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996;351(1346):1463-71.
  21. Baddeley AD, Della Sala S. Working memory and executive control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996;351(1346):1397-404.
  22. Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, et al. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41(1):49-100.
  23. Cummings JL. Clinical neuropsychiatry: Grune & Stratton; 1985.
  24. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 1935;18(6):643.
  25. Fischer M, Vialleron T, Lafaye G, et al. Long-term efects of whole-body vibration on human gait: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2019;10.
  26. Morel DS, da Fontoura Dionello C, Moreira-Marconi E, et al. Relevance of whole body vibration exercise in sport: a short review with soccer, diver and combat sport. Afr J Tradit Complem. 2017;14(4S):19-27.
  27. Faes Y, Banz N, Buscher N, et al. Acute efects of partial-body vibration in sitting position. World J Orthop. 2018;9(9):156-64.
  28. Boonstra AM, Oosterlaan J, Sergeant JA, et al. Executive functioning in adult ADHD: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Med. 2005;35(8):1097-108.
  29. Laird AR, McMillan KM, Lancaster JL, et al. A comparison of label‐based review and ALE meta‐analysis in the Stroop task. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25(1):6-21.
  30. Mathias JL, Wheaton P. Changes in attention and information-processing speed following severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology. 2007;21(2):212. 31.
  31. Luu, D., Aptekar-Cassels, W., Hanson, L., & Murphy, K. (2017). Keyboard latency. Available from: https://danluu.com/keyboard-latency/ . Retrieved June 25, 2020.
  32. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage publications; 2009.
  33. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155.
  34. Daniel DB, Pelotte M, Lewis J. Lack of sex diferences on the Stroop Color-Word Test across three age groups. Percept Mot Skills. 2000;90(2):483-4.
  35. Hasher L, Stoltzfus ER, Zacks RT, et al. Age and inhibition. J Exp Psychol Learn. 1991;17(1):163.
  36. Organization WH. WHO global report on falls prevention in older age: World Health Organization; 2008.
  37. SUVA. Unfallstatistik UVG 2017, Koordinationsgruppe für die Statistik der Unfallversicherung, K.f.d.S.d. Unfallversicherung, Editor. 2017. Available from: https://www.unfallstatistik. ch/d/publik/unfstat/pdf/Ts17.pdf . Retrieved June 25, 2020.
  38. Dunn JE, Rudberg MA, Furner SE, et al. Mortality, disability, and falls in older persons: the role of underlying disease and disability. Am J Public Health. 1992;82(3):395-400.
  39. Tromp A, Smit J, Deeg D, et al. Predictors for falls and fractures in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13(12):1932-9.
  40. Noll DR. Management of falls and balance disorders in theelderly. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013;113(1):17-22.
  41. Anstey KJ, Wood J, Kerr G, et al. Different cognitive profiles for single compared with recurrent fallers without dementia. Neuropsychology. 2009;23(4):500.
  42. Buracchio TJ, Mattek NC, Dodge HH, et al. Executive function predicts risk of falls in older adults without balance impairment. BMC Geriatrics. 2011;11(1):74.
  43. Herman T, Mirelman A, Giladi N, et al. Executive control deficits as a prodrome to falls in healthy older adults: a prospective study linking thinking, walking, and falling. J Gerontol A-Biol. 2010;65(10):1086-92.
  44. Hausdorf JM, Yogev G, Springer S, et al. Walking is more like catching than tapping: gait in the elderly as a complex cognitive task. Exp Brain Res. 2005;164(4):541-8.