Vol. 18 No. 2 (2019)
Original Articles

Reaching velocity during attention and memory tasks - An indicator of frailty in elderly

pdf (pt-br)
  • Daniana Michelle,
  • Miguel Pires,
  • Marlene Rosa
Daniana Michelle
Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria.
Miguel Pires
Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria.
Marlene Rosa
Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria.
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/bjhbs.2019.53505

Published 2020-01-03

Keywords

  • Processing speed,
  • Frailty,
  • Elderly

How to Cite

1.
Daniana Michelle, Miguel Pires, Marlene Rosa. Reaching velocity during attention and memory tasks - An indicator of frailty in elderly. BJHBS [Internet]. 2020 Jan. 3 [cited 2024 Oct. 11];18(2):125-3. Available from: https://bjhbs.hupe.uerj.br/bjhbs/article/view/121

Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Health and Biomedical Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Introduction: Several multidimensional assessment tools have been developed to measure frailty, but their implementation is complex and the vast majority are focused on gait. This has hindered the assessment and prediction of frailty in the elderly without gait preservation. Objective: To characterize processing speed during attention and memory tasks in the geriatric population in different states of frailty; to characterize the factors that most contribute to the frailty phenotype. Methodology: An exploratory descriptive study was conducted in 4 residential facilities in the central region of Portugal including institutionalized elderly aged ≥60 years, using 2 verbal and non-verbal commands. Participants were stratified according to categorical profiles of frailty based on a set of 9 variables: age, social relations, sleep, comorbidities, upper limb motor function, cognitive function, depression, instrumental and basic daily activities. The processing speed tests compared the individuals in the different frailty categories, using the Kruskal-Wallis test p <0.05). Result: One hundred and four elderly people were evaluated: 51 individuals were classified as Robust (G1); 36 as Pre-frail (G2); and 17 as Frail (G3). The processing speed in Attention Tasks was a good predictor for the categorization of frailty profiles G1-G3 (p = 0.000) and G2-G3 (p = 0.004); the range of processing speed in Memory Tasks made a distinction between G1-G3 (p = 0.028).  Conclusion: Processing speed in attention and memory tasks has been shown to be a promising indicator for the characterization of frailty profiles in elderly people who are institutionalized.

pdf (pt-br)

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Nations U. World Population Prospects - The 2015 Revision Key Findings and Advance Tables. 2015.
  2. INE. Projeções da População Residente. 2017.
  3. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype. Journals Gerontol Ser A [Internet]. 2001 Mar 1;56(3):M146–57.
  4. Rodríguez-Mañas L, Féart C, Mann G, et al. Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement: the frailty operative definition-consensus conference project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci [Internet]. 2012/04/16. 2013 Jan;68(1):62–7.
  5. Walston J, Hadley EC, Ferrucci L, et al. Research Agenda for Frailty in Older Adults: Toward a Better Understanding of Physiology and Etiology: Summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Frailty in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc [Internet]. 2006 Jun 1;54(6):991–1001.
  6. Gielen E, Verschueren S, O’Neill TW, et al. Musculoskeletal Frailty: A Geriatric Syndrome at the Core of Fracture Occurrence in Older Age. Calcif Tissue Int [Internet]. 2012;91(3):161– 77.
  7. Gavazzi GL. Frailty and ageing, concept and definitions. Rev Infirm. 2017;66(236):18–20.
  8. Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO. Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: A review. Eur J Intern Med [Internet]. 2016 Jun 1;31:3–10.
  9. Rockwood K, Howlett SE, MacKnight C, et al. Prevalence, Attributes, and Outcomes of Fitness and Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Report From the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Journals Gerontol Ser A [Internet]. 2004 Dec 1;59(12):1310–7.
  10. Binotto MA, Lenardt MH, Rodríguez-Martínez M del C. Fragilidade física e velocidade da marcha em idosos da comunidade: uma revisão sistemática. Vol. 52, Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. scielo; 2018.
  11. Danilovich MK, Diaz L, Corcos DM, et al. Relationship between SHARE-FI Frailty Scores and Physical Performance Measures in Older Adult Medicaid Recipients. Geriatr (Basel, Switzerland) [Internet]. 2018 Aug 11;3(3):51.
  12. Ronthal M. Gait Disorders and Falls in the Elderly. Med Clin North Am [Internet]. 2019;103(2):203–13.
  13. Toosizadeh N, Wendel C, Hsu C-H, et al. Frailty assessment in older adults using upper-extremity function: index development. BMC Geriatr [Internet]. 2017;17(1):117.
  14. Jones D, Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Evaluation of a frailty index based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment in a population based study of elderly Canadians. Vol. 17, Aging clinical and experimental research. 2006. 465–471 p.
  15. Yoo M, Kim S, Kim BS, et al. Moderate hearing loss is related with social frailty in a community-dwelling older adults: The Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS). Arch Gerontol Geriatr [Internet]. 2019;83:126–30.
  16. Devore EE, Grodstein FSE. Sleep Duration in Relation to Cognitive Function among Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies. Neuroepidemiology. 2016;46(1):57–78.
  17. Lee L, Patel T, Hillier LM, et al. Identifying frailty in primary care: A systematic review. Geriatr Gerontol Int [Internet]. 2017 Oct 1;17(10):1358–77.
  18. Malhotra R, Ang S, Allen JC, et al. Normative Values of Hand Grip Strength for Elderly Singaporeans Aged 60 to 89 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc [Internet]. 2016 Sep 1;17(9):864.e1-864.e7.
  19. Gor-García-Fogeda MD, Molina-Rueda F, Cuesta-Gómez A, et al. Scales to Assess Gross Motor Function in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil [Internet]. 2014 Jun 1;95(6):1174–83.
  20. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res [Internet]. 1975;12(3):189–98.
  21. (GERMI) N de E de G da SP de MI. Avaliação Geriátrica. 2015.
  22. Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol J Aging Ment Heal. 1986;5(1–2):165–73.
  23. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud [Internet]. 1988 Jan 1;10(2):64–7.
  24. Araújo F, Ribeiro JLP, Pinto C. Validação do Índice de Barthel numa amostra de idosos não institucionalizados. Rev Saúde Pública Port. 2007;25(2).
  25. Lawton MP BE. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–86.
  26. F.Araújo, Pais-Ribeiro J, Oliveira A, et al. Validação da Escala de Lawton e Brody numa amostra de idosos não institucionalizados. 2008.
  27. Rosa MDD, Pires M, Ferreira L, et al. Ssensory-motor upper extremity extremity function in institutionalised eldelry people - role of emotional and cognitive status. In: Thomson Reuteurs, Ageing Congress. 2019.
  28. Carlson MC, Xue Q-L, Zhou J, et al. Executive decline and dysfunction precedes declines in memory: the Women’s Health and Aging Study II. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci [Internet]. 2009/01/31. 2009 Jan;64(1):110–7.
  29. McGuinness B, Barrett SL, Craig D, et al. Passmore AP. Executive functioning in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25(6):562–8.
  30. Kristensen CH. Funções executivas e envelhecimento - cognição e envelhecimento. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2006. 91–111 p.
  31. Mancilla S E, Valenzuela H J, Escobar C M. Rendimiento en las pruebas _Timed Up and Go_ y _Estación Unipodal_ en adultos mayores chilenos entre 60 y 89 años. Vol. 143, Revista médica de Chile. scielocl; 2015. p. 39–46.
  32. Tang P-F, Yang H-J, Peng Y-C, et al. Motor dual-task Timed Up & Go test better identifies prefrailty individuals than single-task Timed Up & Go test. Geriatr Gerontol Int [Internet]. 2015 Feb 1;15(2):204–10.
  33. Lima LCA, Ansai JH, Andrade LP, et al. The relationship between dual-task and cognitive performance among elderly participants who exercise regularly. Brazilian J Phys Ther [Internet]. 2015/04/27. 2015;19(2):159–66.
  34. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW, et al. No Neuropsychological assessment Title. 4th ed. Oxford University Press., editor. New York: American Psychological Association; 2004.
  35. Lindeboom J, Weinstein H. Neuropsychology of cognitive ageing, minimal cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular cognitive impairment. Eur J Pharmacol [Internet]. 2004;490(1):83–6.
  36. Aprahamian I, Cezar NO de C, Izbicki R, et al. Screening for Frailty With the FRAIL Scale: A Comparison With the Phenotype Criteria. J Am Med Dir Assoc [Internet]. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):592–6.