Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021)
Original Articles

Stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review

PDF
  • Jorge João dos S. Castro. Filho,
  • Paulo M. Neufeld
Jorge João dos S. Castro. Filho
Clínica de Cardiologia. Exército Brasileiro, Brazil.
Paulo M. Neufeld
Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/bjhbs.2021.59743

Published 2021-07-03

Keywords

  • Coronary artery disease,
  • Stress echocardiography,
  • Systematic review

How to Cite

1.
Jorge João dos S. Castro. Filho, Paulo M. Neufeld. Stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review. BJHBS [Internet]. 2021 Jul. 3 [cited 2024 Oct. 11];20(1):27-35. Available from: https://bjhbs.hupe.uerj.br/bjhbs/article/view/64

Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Health and Biomedical Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) contributes to the increase in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, being the main cause of death worldwide. Objectives: This study compares the sensitivity of different methods of execution of Stress Echocardiography (SE) as to the accuracy in determining the presence of CAD, through a Systematic Literature Review (RSL). Methods: The databases of the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (Lilacs) and the Spanish Bibliographic Index of Health Sciences (IBECS) were searched through the Virtual Health Library (VHL) for articles published until December 2018 and including scientific articles published in journals, in any language, which met the following criteria: (A) Descriptive or analytical studies of primary or secondary basis and (B) Studies whose theme was the SE in adult coronary heart disease. Studies related to: (a) Elderly; (b) Animals; (c) Children and Adolescents; (d) Pregnant women; (e) Articles that alluded to left ventricular function, valvulopathies, aneurysms, endocarditis, arrhythmias, implanted electronic devices and other titles that were outside the scope of this work and (f) Articles published in languages other than English or Neolatin languages. Results: The study has selected 14 articles, which demonstrated that SE was accurate to diagnose CAD with sensitivities ranging from 41 to 100% with studies included within the normality curve, demonstrating that it is an excellent tool for the diagnosis of CAD compared to other methods

PDF

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:87–165.
  2. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbachm S, et al. ESCguidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2949-3003.
  3. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2010 update. Circulation. 2010;121(7):46–215.
  4. Antman EM, Tanasijevic MJ, Thompson B, et al. Myocardial infarction redefined – a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction: the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(3):959-69.
  5. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2018;40(2):87-165.
  6. Foy AJ, Dhruva SS, Peterson B, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography vs functional stress testing for patients with suspected coronary artery disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(11):1623-31.
  7. Shah BN, MacNab A, Lynch J, et al. Stress echocardiography in contemporary clinical cardiology: practical considerations and accreditation. Echo Research and Practice. 2018;5:1-6.
  8. Ministério da Saúde. Saúde Brasil 2017: Uma análise da situação de saúde e os desafios para o alcance dos objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável. Brasília: DF, 2018.
  9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-69.
  10. Wong WCW, Cheung CSK, Hart GJ. Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2008;5:23.
  11. Colorafi KJ, Evans B. Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2016;9(4):16–25.
  12. Alfaro M, Palma G, Moreno O, et al. Experiencia con ecocardiograma de estrés dipiridamol y Reserva coronaria no invasiva: Comunicación preliminar. Rev Chil Cardiol. 2013;32(2):111-16.
  13. Kamiya K, Sakakibara M, Asakawa N, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance performs better in the detection of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis compared to single-photon emission computed tomography and dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circ J. 2014;78(10):2468-76.
  14. Nagy AI, Sahlén A, Manouras A, et al. Combination of contrast-enhanced wall motion analysis and myocardial deformation imaging during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(1):88-95. v. 20, n. 1, jan-jun/2021 35
  15. Shehata M. Relation between ischaemic threshold measured during dobutamine stress echocardiography and coronary angiographic features. Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(12):1380-7.
  16. Cusmà-Piccione M, Zito C, Oreto L, et al. Longitudinal strain by automated function imaging detects single-vessel coronary artery disease in patients undergoing dipyridamole stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(10):1214-21.
  17. Aggeli C, Lagoudakou S, Felekos I, et al. Two-dimensional speckle tracking for the assessment of coronary artery disease during dobutamine stress echo: clinical tool or merely research method. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2015;24:13-43.
  18. Utsunomiya H, Hidaka T, Masada K, et al. Value of resting echocardiographic findings and dobutamine stress echocardiography for diagnosing myocardial ischemia in patients with suspected angina pectoris. Echocardiography. 2015;32(6):993-1002.
  19. Park JH, Woo JS, Ju S, et al. Layer-specific analysis of dobutamine stress echocardiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Medicine (Baltimore).2016;95(32):4549.
  20. Ejlersen JA, Poulsen SH, Mortensen J, et al. A comparison of the diagnostic value of 2D strain stress echocardiography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, and Duke treadmill score in patients suspected of coronary artery disease. Echocardiography. 2016;33(10):1523-31.
  21. Rumbinaite E, Zaliaduonyte-Peksiene D, Lapinskas T, et al. Early and late diastolic strain rate vs global longitudinal strain at rest and during dobutamine stress for the assessment of significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with a moderate and high probability of coronary artery disease. Echocardiography. 2016;33(10):1512-22.
  22. Čelutkienė J, Burneikaitė G, Petkevičius L, et al. Combination of single quantitative parameters into multiparametric model for ischemia detection is not superior to visual assessment during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016;14(1):13.
  23. Kataoka A, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Senior R, et al. Transient ischemic dilatation during stress echocardiography: an additional marker of significant myocardial ischemia. Echocardiography. 2016;33(8):1202-8.
  24. Dattilo G, Imbalzano E, Lamari A, et al. Ischemic heart disease and early diagnosis. Study on the predictive value of 2D strain. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;215:150-6.
  25. Gurunathan S, Ahmed A, Vamvakidou A, et al. Diagnostic concordance and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing fractional flow reserve and stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary stenosis of intermediate severity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(2):180-86.
  26. Bastos JLD, Duquia RP. Erratum para: Um dos delineamentos mais empregados em epidemiologia: Estudo transversal. Sci Med. 2013; 23:229–32.
  27. Garg AX, Hackman D, Tonelli M. Systematic review and meta-analysis: when one study is just not enough. CJASN. 2008;3(1):253-60.
  28. Wright RW, Brand RA, Dunn W, et al. How to write a systematic review. MD Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:23-9.
  29. Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance,interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:1021-41.